Path: EDN Asia >> Design Centre >> Communications/Network >> Selecting PCB material for RF
Communications/Network Share print

Selecting PCB material for RF

01 Nov 2012  | Steve Hageman

Share this page with your friends

If you were building a 2.5GHz Bluetooth module and the RF traces were about an inch long total – would you really care about a 0.3-dB signal loss, especially in light of the fact that the antenna matching circuit will probably exhibit more loss than this? Probably not. Even if you used Rogers RO4350B with its loss at 2.5GHz of 0.13 dB/inch you would only be saving 0.17 dB.

Sensitivity to physical parameters
Most even slightly experienced engineers know that the Er of FR-4 is wildly variable not only between vendors but with frequency. This is true, but how does this variability stack up against the other obvious variable – like board thickness? Figure 3 compares all these variations.

Figure 3: The sensitivity to Er and board thickness are compared on FR-4 over a range of values. First the sensitivity to trace impedance with varying Er was tabulated over the commonly thought of values for Er (4.3 to 4.9). Then the sensitivity to trace impedance with varying the board thickness was calculated. The line length to get a 45 degree phase shift at 6GHz was likewise recorded for each parameter.

As can be seen, the result is that while Er does indeed affect trace impedance, its sensitivity is proportional to the square root of Er. So for a huge Er change of 4.3 to 4.9, the total trace impedance changes only 2.7 ohms peak to peak. It should be noted that on my 2-inch test board that I have been building for years, I have not seen this level of variation which suggests that the lot-to-lot variation of a single FR-4 supplier is quite good and way better than the worst-case numbers commonly quoted.

What is more interesting however is the impedance variation due to board thickness. Figure 3 also shows this for a 5% thickness variation in a nominally 59-mil thick PCB. The trace impedance changes 3.5 ohms peak to peak.

So the board thickness variation causes the calculated trace impedance to vary more than the wildly variable Er values that are commonly quoted.

Another interesting fact about figure 3: I tabulated what length an electrical 45 degree line would need to be for each case at 6GHz. The electrical length changes with changing Er, but not with changing board thickness. If your circuit design incorporates distributed elements made from transmission lines to build circuits like filters or matching networks, then you are calculating line lengths to make certain electrical lengths to synthesize the equivalent capacitive or inductive elements. These lumped elements will change value with changing Er, but not so much with PCB thickness changes.

The Er of FR-4 also varies with frequency as shown in figure 4.

Now that we have analyzed some of the performance parameters and tradeoffs of plain old FR-4 we have found that the loss isn't all that bad under 6GHz, and the many times unspecified and wildly varying Er is sometimes troublesome—especially if you are trying to use distributed circuit elements in your designs—but otherwise FR-4 can work in even high-performance RF circuits.

Incrementally improving on plain Old FR-4
The first thing that can be done to improve on the generic FR-4 is to use a FR-4-like material that has a specified and controlled Er range. This material won't be called FR-4 but will be made out of the same type of "Glass Epoxy" technology. PCB shops typically like these materials because they process with the same FR-4 manufacturing flow. There are many manufacturers that supply materials like this [3] and you should also make sure that the completed board uses material that can survive the high-temperature lead-free assembly processing temperatures, if you have this requirement also.

The Er of these materials is usually also much more stable with frequency than FR-4, so if the Er was plotted as shown in figure 4, the Er line would be very much flatter. Most of these materials have an Er of around 4.4 to 3.9 or so.

Figure 4: It is well known that the Er of plain old FR-4 varies with frequency. This composite data from various sources suggests that the variation is from about 4.7 at low frequencies to less than 4.4 at high frequencies.


 First Page Previous Page 1 • 2 • 3 Next Page Last Page


Want to more of this to be delivered to you for FREE?

Subscribe to EDN Asia alerts and receive the latest design ideas and product news in your inbox.

Got to make sure you're not a robot. Please enter the code displayed on the right.

Time to activate your subscription - it's easy!

We have sent an activate request to your registerd e-email. Simply click on the link to activate your subscription.

We're doing this to protect your privacy and ensure you successfully receive your e-mail alerts.


Add New Comment
Visitor (To avoid code verification, simply login or register with us. It is fast and free!)
*Verify code:
Tech Impact

Regional Roundup
Control this smart glass with the blink of an eye
K-Glass 2 detects users' eye movements to point the cursor to recognise computer icons or objects in the Internet, and uses winks for commands. The researchers call this interface the "i-Mouse."

GlobalFoundries extends grants to Singapore students
ARM, Tencent Games team up to improve mobile gaming


News | Products | Design Features | Regional Roundup | Tech Impact