Path: EDN Asia >> News Centre >> IC/Board/Systems Design >> Going DIY for IoT: Are we ready to build from scratch?
IC/Board/Systems Design Share print

Going DIY for IoT: Are we ready to build from scratch?

03 Jul 2015  | Rob Spiegel

Share this page with your friends

Now that the Internet of Things (IoT) has established itself as a 'staple' technology, the question now is this: do you have to do it yourself (DIY) when it comes to IoT? The pressure is on for makers, both industrial and consumer, to make their products connected. Recently, Samsung's CEO, BK Yoon, stated that by 2020 all the company's products will be Internet connected.

Last week Jeffrey Immelt, CEO of GE, declared that all tech companies will have to become software companies. The idea is that the ability to manage data from products will make or break manufacturers going forward.

The IoT has arrived with the bluster and sky-high promises of the Dot-com era, and it shares a big question with that rush of new technology. Do you do it yourself or job it out to a service company? For many companies, the first instinct is to build a custom solution from the ground up, just as companies forged into website building early on. That solution requires R&D, testing, data management, and a sound security plan. Immelt suggests that's part of doing business in the Big Data era.

IoT map

A map of IoT shows the divergent audience of those who produce and monitor device-connected data. (Source: Arrayent)

Other companies are turning to service companies to ramp up IoT quick and dirty. One service company, Arrayent, offers a cloud-based out-of-the-box IoT platform and operating system. These service companies tend to fall into two categories, one for consumer products (such as Arrayent) and one for industry (such as PTC's LiveWorx).

The Arrayent Connect Platform was developed to help consumer product companies such as Whirlpool. "Almost every company making physical things has to think about how connectivity plays in their products," Shane Dyer, CEO of Arrayent, stated. "If you're a thermostat manufacturer and you're not making connected thermostats, you're out of business."

Dyer emphasised that the trend toward IoT connectivity came on fast, which left manufacturers scrambling. "Two years ago, IoT was stuck in R&D as a division. That shifted quickly," he said. "Now IoT has become a department in the C suite. Companies are trying to see how they play in this new world. It's like the Internet in 1998. They know they have to do it or be left behind."

The question of whether to DIY on IoT is both philosophical and practical. What is your core business? To make washing machines or run a data connectivity platform? GE's Immelt suggests the answer is both. Yet many companies are not prepared to launch a major data management initiative. "In this environment, there is a question of whether the company's core competency is with the product or with worldwide cloud connectivity," said Dyer. "Is your competency in creating communication software that lets customers know if they've left their stove on, if you're Whirlpool, or if the garage door is open, if you make garage door openers?"

Dyer asks whether companies are prepared to build the infrastructure from scratch. "Are you going to start an R&D group and hire all kinds of engineers who are skilled in running services that connect hundreds of thousands or millions of objects?" he asked. "One of our lighting customers was able to put devices on shelves in 30 markets in five months because they used a platform."

The management of data is implicit in the IoT. Creating the hardware connections may be the easiest part. The difficulty may lie in the ability to use the incoming data in an effective way to bring customers closer and improve products. "The data can help companies make better decisions. That's the number one reason for the IoT," said Dyer. "The stream of data from devices in the field is a fire hose, and you need tools to understand it."

Security is another major issue. Whether companies develop their own IoT platform or use service companies with existing platforms, security is a world of dangers. "With almost every connected product you have to think about the security of the devices," said Dyer. "The biggest danger is that early software may overlook security that can damage the brand. We go through five or six security audits to make sure the core system is protected."

The solutions that came out of the Dot-com era were mixed. Some companies jobbed out their web services while others such as Wal-Mart became Internet experts. Relying on the wrong web services company can be trouble, the disastrous roll-out of the Affordable Care Act is a famous recent example. Yet the DIY route may require a deep investment in technology expertise, and that could make a service platform look attractive.




Want to more of this to be delivered to you for FREE?

Subscribe to EDN Asia alerts and receive the latest design ideas and product news in your inbox.

Got to make sure you're not a robot. Please enter the code displayed on the right.

Time to activate your subscription - it's easy!

We have sent an activate request to your registerd e-email. Simply click on the link to activate your subscription.

We're doing this to protect your privacy and ensure you successfully receive your e-mail alerts.


Add New Comment
Visitor (To avoid code verification, simply login or register with us. It is fast and free!)
*Verify code:
Tech Impact

Regional Roundup
Control this smart glass with the blink of an eye
K-Glass 2 detects users' eye movements to point the cursor to recognise computer icons or objects in the Internet, and uses winks for commands. The researchers call this interface the "i-Mouse."

GlobalFoundries extends grants to Singapore students
ARM, Tencent Games team up to improve mobile gaming


News | Products | Design Features | Regional Roundup | Tech Impact