Path: EDN Asia >> Design Centre >> Power/Smart Energy >> Selecting PWM controller for narrow on-time conversion
Power/Smart Energy Share print

Selecting PWM controller for narrow on-time conversion

14 Jul 2015  | Dhananjay Singh

Share this page with your friends

The control method used by a controller largely drives the minimum on-time it can control. Some intentional delays inside the gate drive circuit, such as blanking time, also affect the minimum on-time. In a typical current mode PWM controller, the size of the PWM pulse is determined by the output of the error amplifier and the inductor current signal as shown in figure 1. The current loop senses the inductor current signal and compares it to the VCOMP reference to modulate the PWM pulse width. Since the current loop will force the inductor peak or valley current to follow the voltage error amplifier output, the inductor will not appear in the voltage control loop. The double pole LC filter becomes a single capacitive pole structure for the voltage loop. A simple type 2 compensation is enough to stabilise the voltage loop.


Figure 1: A simple current mode control architecture.


Suitable modulators for narrow on-time operation
Peak current mode control is one of the most commonly used architectures, and while it's well understood and offers reliable control techniques with multiple advantages, it exhibits significant shortcomings when narrow on-time operations are required. In peak current mode, inductor current information is sensed across the upper MOSFET. Figure 2 shows typical current waveforms in the upper and lower MOSFET in relation to the PWM signal. The turn on event of the upper MOSFET generates a significant amount of ringing due to different parasitics inside and outside of the MOSFETs in the turn on loop. This ringing can send erroneous signals to control circuitry and falsely terminate the PWM signal.

To resolve this, peak current mode switching controllers ignore this initial ringing by using blanking time before sensing the inductor current. Typically, a blanking time of 150ns to 250ns is employed. This blanking time requirement will not allow peak current mode controllers to regulate a very narrow on-time power conversion. Even a 12V to 1V power conversion would be difficult to regulate at 600kHz frequency, which translates into less than 140ns minimum on-time.
Valley current mode control
An alternative is valley current mode control, which easily overcomes the blanking time shortfall of peak current mode control. In valley current mode control, the inductor current signal is sensed during the off-time of the upper MOSFET, avoiding the upper MOSFET ringing. This solves the problem of controlling very narrow on-time PWM pulses. However, valley current mode comes with its own set of limitations.


Figure 2: Buck converter waveforms depict signal sense location in current mode control architectures.


Two major issues with valley current mode control are sub-harmonic oscillation and poor line regulation. Sub-harmonic oscillation is a common problem with any current mode control. It occurs in peak current mode control as well, but at more than 50% duty cycle. For valley current mode, the reverse is true.

The sub-harmonic oscillations in current mode controllers (both peak mode and valley mode) are preventable using slope compensation. However, fixed slope compensation cannot handle all duty cycles and inductors. The sub-harmonic oscillation problem reappears if the duty cycle is far away from the assumed value used in the slope compensation design.


Peak current mode control
Another option is emulated peak current mode control, a variant of peak current mode that avoids the blanking time limitation. It overcomes the upper MOSFET ringing by measuring the valley current information across the lower MOSFET. This valley current information is then used to emulate the inductor upslope to obtain the peak current information.

As in peak current mode control, emulated peak current mode also suffers from sub-harmonic oscillation and needs slope compensation. This slope compensation is derived from the emulated peak current signal. Though emulated peak current mode is designed to have the benefits of both peak current mode and valley current mode control methods, its shortcomings are mostly due to a lack of inductance information in the control loop.
The best of both modes
Valley current mode with adaptive slope compensation is a way to overcome the shortcomings of traditional valley current mode control. An optimised adaptive slope compensation circuit can prevent the sub-harmonic oscillation for all duty cycles. This adaptive compensation and inherent capability of low duty cycle operation enables a controller with this architecture to operate at very high switching frequency.

Intersil's ISL8117 buck controller is an example of a valley current mode control with low side MOSFETs Rdson, valley current sense and adaptive slope compensation. As shown in figure 3, the ISL8117's ramp signal adapts to the applied input voltage to improve the line regulation. A unique implementation of valley current mode and the optimised slope compensation resolves the shortcomings of traditional valley current mode controllers. Its unique control technique allows it to support a very wide range of input and output voltages. In essence, it is a hybrid between voltage and current mode control, displaying advantages of both modulation architectures.

The ISL8117 can operate from any voltage between 4.5V and 60V, and its output can be adjusted from 0.6V to 54V. It has an adjustable frequency range of 100kHz to 2000kHz and can produce minimum on-time of 40ns (typical). With a minimum on-time of 40ns, the controller can generate 1V output from a 12V bus at 1.5MHz. It is also capable of generating a 1V supply from a 48V source at lower frequency. Figure 4 shows the transient from a stable 48V to 1.2V conversion. In systems susceptible to a particular switching frequency noise, the ISL8117 can be synchronised to any external frequency source to reduce radiated system noise and beat frequency noise mitigation.


Figure 3: Internal control block diagram of ISL8117.


Figure 4: Transient response of 0A to 6A, 6A to 0A from a stable 48V to 1.2V converter.


With this synchronous buck controller, engineers can design a complete DC/DC buck conversion solution with only 10 components, including MOSFETs and passives, and achieve up to 98% conversion efficiency with 1.5% output voltage accuracy. The ISL8117's low pin count and layout friendly pin architecture, as seen in figure 5, also minimises the number of overlapping traces, further improving power supply performance.


Figure 5: Typical application of ISL8117.


Conclusion
Modulation control modes each come with their own set of limitations but recent innovations, such as the ISL8117 60V buck controller with its hybrid VCM and adaptive slope compensation, offer a more flexible and easier to design power supply solution. The ISL8117 enables system designers to remove an intermediate conversion stage to achieve better power efficiency in a smaller footprint, while lowering system costs and increasing reliability.


About the author
Dhananjay Singh is a Product Marketing Manager for Industrial & Infrastructure Products at Intersil Corporation. He is responsible for research, definition, development and marketing of power products for the Industrial market. Prior to joining Intersil, Mr. Singh was a Design Engineer at both JVC in Japan and at MIRC Electronics, Ltd in New Delhi. He holds a Master of Technology degree in Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University) in Varanasi, India.


 First Page Previous Page 1 • 2


Want to more of this to be delivered to you for FREE?

Subscribe to EDN Asia alerts and receive the latest design ideas and product news in your inbox.

Got to make sure you're not a robot. Please enter the code displayed on the right.

Time to activate your subscription - it's easy!

We have sent an activate request to your registerd e-email. Simply click on the link to activate your subscription.

We're doing this to protect your privacy and ensure you successfully receive your e-mail alerts.


Add New Comment
Visitor (To avoid code verification, simply login or register with us. It is fast and free!)
*Verify code:
Tech Impact

Regional Roundup
Control this smart glass with the blink of an eye
K-Glass 2 detects users' eye movements to point the cursor to recognise computer icons or objects in the Internet, and uses winks for commands. The researchers call this interface the "i-Mouse."

GlobalFoundries extends grants to Singapore students
ARM, Tencent Games team up to improve mobile gaming


News | Products | Design Features | Regional Roundup | Tech Impact